I have to apologize in advance for any heartache that "dynamicizing" the databases may have caused the Princeton researchers. While they informed me that such a change had been considered and deemed a possibility (given the funding), I can't help but feel like a hack invading their esteemed lexicographer territory. The "5 Papers" documentation reads, "WordNet's source files are written by lexicographers. They are the product of a detailed relational analysis of lexical semantics." That means no adding specialized definitions for "mongers", people.